Quote of the day 4th December 2013

"Democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.”
( Thomas Jefferson )

Comments

Jim said…
In the UK, democracy can not cease to exist, the reason it cant is because the UK is not a democracy, its an elected dictatorship.

The whole idea of parliamentary sovereignty goes against the very idea of democracy.

"Representative democracy" is about as federal as the federal express or federal reserve is federal. people think its democratic because it has the word decmocracy in its name, of course it is not. representative democracy (especially when those elected dont even represent the veiw of their own electorate, rather the party whip) can never be democratic.

The eu also works on "representative democracy" which of course is elected or in the case of the EU even none elected dictatorship, and then they have the gall to brush away democracy as "populism"

So i ask how on earth can democracy fail in the UK, when we have never had it?

would you like a head start on introducing it, ok, a simple 6 demands would be a worthy way to start:

1. Recognition of our sovereignty: the peoples of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland comprise the ultimate authority of their nations and are the source of all political power. That fact shall be recognised by the Crown and the Governments of our nations, and our Parliaments and Assemblies

2. Real local democracy: the foundation of our democracy shall be the counties (or other local units as may be defined), which shall become constitutional bodies exercising under the control of their peoples all powers of legislation, taxation and administration not specifically granted by the people to the national government;

3. Separation of powers: the executive shall be separated from the legislature. To that effect, prime ministers shall be elected by popular vote; they shall appoint their own ministers, with the approval of parliament, to assist in the exercise of such powers as may be granted to them by the sovereign people of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland; no prime ministers or their ministers shall be members of parliament or any legislative assembly;

4. The people’s consent: no law, treaty or government decision shall take effect without the consent of the majority of the people, by positive vote if so demanded, and that none shall continue to have effect when that consent is withdrawn by the majority of the people;

5. No taxation or spending without consent: no tax, charge or levy shall be imposed, nor any public spending authorised, nor any sum borrowed by any national or local government except with the express approval the majority of the people, renewed annually on presentation of a budget which shall first have been approved by their respective legislatures;

6. A constitutional convention: Parliament, once members of the executive are excluded, must host a constitutional convention to draw up a definitive codified constitution for the peoples of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. It shall recognise their sovereign status and their inherent, inalienable rights and which shall be subject to their approval.
Chris Whiteside said…
Is democracy in the UK imperfect?

Yes.

Should we try to improve it?

Yes. Need time to think about whether the ideas you suggest might be worth looking at, some might but I am never, ever, ever going to agree that representative democracy is not democratic.

I had too much experience as a student of how direct democracy can produce results which in practice were not what the average person, if they were willing to spend as much time in meetings as the fanatics do, would have voted for.

Hence does the fact that democracy in the UK is not perfect mean we do not have democracy?

Absolutely not.
Jim said…
once elected how do we get rid of a government thats no good - lets say for the sake of argument labour under a certain scots man.

The answer is we cant, there is nothing the voter can do, but put up with stupid idea after stupid idea up until the next election.

spending is never authorised, if it was there would be a referendum after every budget to see if the public approves it or not.

as is the current system allows an out of control government to pass many laws that few people want, as they have a majority in paliament, a good example would be signing a treaty without a referendum. they can spend spend spend, leave the country in dire straits and leave the tax payer on the hook for the bill. The key thing is the taxpayer was never asked "shall we bail out the banks?" Then those responsible are not held to account.
Currently the people of copeland can think what ever they like on any issue, but the person who is supposed to represent them in parliament will simply vote the way the labour party tells him to.

As is the only thing that is remotely democratic is the fact every 5 years we get to elect the mp we want, except a lot of the time we dont vote for that reason, people tend to vote to keep the other people out.

There is nothing about representative democracy that is democratic.

OK, you are worried that democracy would lead to the proverbial "two wolves and a sheep voting whats for lunch" or "mob rule", but, look at Europe, and tell me which is both the most free and most prosperous country? - oh its Switzerland isn't it. Not bad for 2 wolves and a sheep huh?

You tend to find when you treat people like adults they act like adults and take some responsibility for their actions. Could you honestly of imagined the british people agreeing to an idea to sell off the nations gold at a rock bottom price, for Euro's?

- me nither, but the current system allows a government to do it then get off scot free.

Popular posts from this blog

Nick Herbert on his visit to flood hit areas of Cumbria

Quotes of the day 19th August 2020

Quote of the day 24th July 2020