Copeland Council's Accounts
According to the Labour executive's report to tomorrow's meeting of Copeland council, which was written a few days ago,
"The audit of the 2007/08 accounts and the post-audit amendments in relation to the 2006/7 accounts are progressing. The Head of Finance and MIS and the Audit Commission manager have met regularly to discuss progress and actions arising. The Audit Commission will provide feedback on the progress of the audit to the Audit Committee at its' meeting of 7th January (the meeting of 17th December was re-arranged.)"
Unfortunately the report containing that feedback is a "Part II" report, e.g. one which is confidential, and I would therefore be breaking the rules if I said what was in the report.
I can and will say, however, that
* I am very concerned indeed by the issues raised in the Audit report
* The accounting problems about which Copeland councillors have had previous debates at full council and audit reports have, to put it very mildly, not been fully resolved
* I think the Audit Commission report should be circulated to all councillors, and
* An up-to-date report on what has been going wrong with the council's accounts needs to be debated in a public forum so that Copeland's taxpayers and voters can have an opportunity to know how their money has been managed.
"The audit of the 2007/08 accounts and the post-audit amendments in relation to the 2006/7 accounts are progressing. The Head of Finance and MIS and the Audit Commission manager have met regularly to discuss progress and actions arising. The Audit Commission will provide feedback on the progress of the audit to the Audit Committee at its' meeting of 7th January (the meeting of 17th December was re-arranged.)"
Unfortunately the report containing that feedback is a "Part II" report, e.g. one which is confidential, and I would therefore be breaking the rules if I said what was in the report.
I can and will say, however, that
* I am very concerned indeed by the issues raised in the Audit report
* The accounting problems about which Copeland councillors have had previous debates at full council and audit reports have, to put it very mildly, not been fully resolved
* I think the Audit Commission report should be circulated to all councillors, and
* An up-to-date report on what has been going wrong with the council's accounts needs to be debated in a public forum so that Copeland's taxpayers and voters can have an opportunity to know how their money has been managed.
Comments
At today's full council meeting David Moore asked who made the decision to class it as a confidential document and why (making clear that in his opinion, which I share, it should have been public.)
In reply it was confirmed by the council's principal legal officer, Martin Jepson, that the decision had been made by council officers, on the grounds that the the harm to the public interest in revealing it exceeded the bendfits of revealing it.
Richard's right, everything should be out in the open, Councilors of all flavours should demand it.
I think that the public interest would have been served by doing so.