Quote of the day 19th November 2024

“The non-crime hate incident is a legal abomination, attacking freedom of speech through the use of blacklisting and requiring almost nothing in the way of proof” 

This was the sub-title of The Times first leader “Wasting Police Time” on 15th November 2024.

Unfortunately, as the article proceeds to demonstrate, the dangers associated with this are far more serious than just wasting police time.

The article continues:

“The non-crime hate incident (CHHI) which ahs taken root in the UK in the last decade, is the invasive plant species of the justice system: it grows from very shallow legal soil, spreads fast across formerly well-marked boundaries and appears remarkably difficult to control.

The concept first arose from College of Policing Guidelines in 201 and has had a complicated and frequently unsettling trajectory ever since. Put as simply as possible, it places police under an obligation to record an incident, if the individual who reports it believes it was motivated by hostility towards a person or group with a particular characteristic such as race, religion, disability, sexual orientation and transgender identity.

In addition, an NCHI can be reported by a third party who was not the target of the alleged hatred, but who nonetheless witnessed it.

Confused? The public certainly are. So, it appears, are the police. 

As a Times investigation reveals, many recent NCHIs recorded by police forces involve expressions which might range from valid opinion to silly or offensive, but should never fall under the remit of any sane police force at all.” 

I did not agree with everything Suella Braverman did at Home Secretary, but she was absolutely right in June 2023 to put in place a code of conduct which included a higher threshold for NCHIs under which personal data could only be recorded in relation to such an alleged incident if it was “clearly motivated by intentional hostility” and risked causing significant harm or a criminal offence.

She said at the time that forces should record these incidents only "when it is absolutely necessary and proportionate and not simply because someone is offended".

Quite.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nick Herbert on his visit to flood hit areas of Cumbria

Please note that the post below was published more than ten year ago on 21st November 2009 Nick Herbert MP, shadow cabinet member for the Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs, was in Cumbria this morning to see the areas affected by the flooding. He writes on Conservative Home about his visit. Here is an extract. I’ve been in Cumbria today to see the areas affected by the floods. I arrived early in Keswick where I met officials from the Environment Agency. Although the river levels had fallen considerably and homes were no longer flooded, the damage to homes had been done. And the water which had got into houses wasn’t just from the river – it was foul water which had risen from the drains. I talked to fire crews who were pumping flood water back into the river, and discovered that they were from Tyne & Wear and Lancashire. They had been called in at an hours’ notice and had been working on the scene ever since, staying at a local hotel. You cannot fail to be impressed by the...
Read more

Quotes of the day 19th August 2020

Image
"Wise men profit more from fools than fools from wise men; for the wise men shun the mistakes of fools, but fools do not imitate the successes of the wise."  ( Cato the Elder , who lived 234 BC - 149 BC, quoted in "Lives" by Plutarch.) There is a similar saying by Germany's Iron Chancellor, Otto von Bismarck: Benjamin Franklin is supposed to have put the same saying in a more humorous form: "Wise men profit by the mistakes of others, while fools will not learn even from their own blunders." See also this thread on the "Quote Investigator" website . Let us all be wise and learn from the events of the last few days.
Read more

Quote of the day 24th July 2020

I was moved to put the passage below forward as a quote today when I saw a horrible post on twitter from someone writing that it was "excellent" that someone who took a different view from her about Brexit had died. I won't write which way round it was so that all the Remain supporters can assume the post was from a Brexit fanatic welcoming the death of a remainer and all the Leavers can assume it was a Remainiac welcoming one less Brexiteer. There's been plenty of nasty stuff on both sides but if you catch anyone of your own viewpoint  posting something like that who might listen to you, please do call them out on it - and point out that they're giving everyone on your side of the argument a bad name. Anyway, here's the quote from John Donne.
Read more