Tom Newton Dunn of the Sun on the Tusk Tweet
Tom Newton Dunn of the Sun has two interesting comments on Donald Tusk's comments about a special place in hell reserved for the leaders of the Brexit campaign.
He suggests that this may have been intended to give the EU Council political space for a concession to Britain.
Not sure this was a sound strategy given that the PM will have to get a deal including that concession through the House of Commons, where Tusk's tweet has inflamed passions further.
Very interestingly considering which newspaper he works for, Newton Dunn has also tweeted a thread in which he argues that, despite it being an unpopular view at Westminster, Tusk's criticism of the Brexiteers has some validity.
He wrote:
He suggests that this may have been intended to give the EU Council political space for a concession to Britain.
Not sure this was a sound strategy given that the PM will have to get a deal including that concession through the House of Commons, where Tusk's tweet has inflamed passions further.
Very interestingly considering which newspaper he works for, Newton Dunn has also tweeted a thread in which he argues that, despite it being an unpopular view at Westminster, Tusk's criticism of the Brexiteers has some validity.
He wrote:
- "The Leave campaign took the conscious decision at the start of the #EUref campaign in 2016 to keep both their definition of Brexit and any plan to deliver it vague
- Why? So that they wouldn't fall into Alex Salmond's trap during the #indyref of getting killed on the detail. @matthew_elliott confirmed this at the time, and it was a masterful strategy that worked
- The downside is, as we all now know, Britain has spent the subsequent 2 and a half years tearing itself apart over exactly what the 17.4m who voted for Brexit want from it
- That, or a fair amount of it, could have been avoided if @BorisJohnson and others had argued on detail rather than sentiment, and we may well not be in this mess now
- Two caveats: 1. some more honourable leavers, who knew a bit more about the EU, did try to argue on detail (eg @DanielJHannan or @chhcalling) but they received little attention from voters/us the media at the time
- Caveat 2 - consigning them to hell is a tad strong. Two and half years in purgatory is a more fitting punishment. Here endeth the thread."
Comments