Phil King on local government and the merits and disadvantages of reorganisation

Phil King, who is an experienced Conservative councillor, has a superlative piece on Conservative Home about when local government reorganisation brings benefits and when it is vandalism. It includes some excellent quotes.

Here are some extracts.

"Over Christmas, many of us are reminded of what home really means. Time spent in our houses, villages, towns and neighbourhoods brings into focus the places, services and communities we rely on every day.

Home is not an abstract concept. It is where people raise families, care for ageing parents, put down roots, and build a sense of belonging that no national slogan can replicate.

For most people, politics only really matters when it touches their home: whether they can afford to live there, get a GP appointment nearby, feel safe on local streets, and trust that growth will not overwhelm the place they love.

Yet across the country, we are failing at exactly that.

Too often, decisions that shape homes and communities are taken far away from them, by faceless technocrats. Housing numbers are imposed without infrastructure. Health services are reorganised without regard to local access. Transport strategies promise transformation but deliver congestion and delay. Residents are told to trust the system, even as outcomes worsen before their eyes."


"A home is embedded in schools, surgeries, roads, landscapes, and social networks. When those fail, no amount of rhetoric about community can compensate.

I see this daily in local government. Villages facing speculative development because five-year housing land supplies have collapsed. Residents struggling to access NHS dentistry within a reasonable distance. Families caught in limbo as planning chaos and infrastructure delays leave services overstretched. None of this is caused by a lack of care locally. It is caused by systems that are distant, fragmented, and poorly led.

This matters deeply as much of England enters a new wave of Local Government Reorganisation. Structural change can be an opportunity, but only if it strengthens accountability and delivery. Re-drawing council maps will not, on its own, fix broken services. If reorganisation becomes an exercise in scale for its own sake, producing larger authorities, remoter leadership and weaker local voice, communities will feel even further removed from the decisions that shape their homes and increasingly disenfranchised."


"There is a temptation in politics to retreat into theory: to talk about values without grappling with delivery. But people experience the state not through philosophy, but through outcomes.

If a family cannot get a GP appointment, the system has failed them. If a community sees thousands of homes approved without roads or schools, leadership has failed them. If decisions about place are made without accountability, trust drains away.

Home flourishes when institutions work, and when they are close enough to be held to account.

That is why Conservatives should be unapologetic about reforming over-centralised systems. Not to weaken the state, but to make it effective again. Power should sit as close to people as possible, but it must also be exercised competently. Devolution without delivery is just decentralised failure.

We should also be honest about growth. 

Homes are needed, but growth without infrastructure is not development; it is damage. 

Communities will support change when it is fair, planned and accompanied by real investment. They revolt when it is chaotic, imposed and disconnected from reality."


"We should stand for homes that are affordable, places that are protected, and services that work. For planning that respects settlement character. For health systems judged on access and outcomes, not endless reorganisations. For local leadership that is empowered- and expected – to deliver.

Home does not disappear by accident. It is dismantled when ideology replaces competence, when local voice is silenced, and when Conservatives hesitate to stand up, without apology, for the people, places and culture they were elected to serve."


You can read the whole article at

Phil King: Home is about place, not just property | Conservative Home


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nick Herbert on his visit to flood hit areas of Cumbria

Please note that the post below was published more than ten years ago on 21st November 2009 Nick Herbert MP, shadow cabinet member for the Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs, was in Cumbria this morning to see the areas affected by the flooding. He writes on Conservative Home about his visit. Here is an extract. I’ve been in Cumbria today to see the areas affected by the floods. I arrived early in Keswick where I met officials from the Environment Agency. Although the river levels had fallen considerably and homes were no longer flooded, the damage to homes had been done. And the water which had got into houses wasn’t just from the river – it was foul water which had risen from the drains. I talked to fire crews who were pumping flood water back into the river, and discovered that they were from Tyne & Wear and Lancashire. They had been called in at an hours’ notice and had been working on the scene ever since, staying at a local hotel. You cannot fail to be impressed by th...
Read more

Quotes of the day 19th August 2020

Image
"Wise men profit more from fools than fools from wise men; for the wise men shun the mistakes of fools, but fools do not imitate the successes of the wise."  ( Cato the Elder , who lived 234 BC - 149 BC, quoted in "Lives" by Plutarch.) There is a similar saying by Germany's Iron Chancellor, Otto von Bismarck: Benjamin Franklin is supposed to have put the same saying in a more humorous form: "Wise men profit by the mistakes of others, while fools will not learn even from their own blunders." See also this thread on the "Quote Investigator" website . Let us all be wise and learn from the events of the last few days.
Read more

Quote of the day 24th July 2020

I was moved to put the passage below forward as a quote today when I saw a horrible post on twitter from someone writing that it was "excellent" that someone who took a different view from her about Brexit had died. I won't write which way round it was so that all the Remain supporters can assume the post was from a Brexit fanatic welcoming the death of a remainer and all the Leavers can assume it was a Remainiac welcoming one less Brexiteer. There's been plenty of nasty stuff on both sides but if you catch anyone of your own viewpoint  posting something like that who might listen to you, please do call them out on it - and point out that they're giving everyone on your side of the argument a bad name. Anyway, here's the quote from John Donne.
Read more