Cruddas suggests major parties might cease to exist in a decade

The Conservative (formerly Tory) and Liberal Democrat (formerly Whig) parties have both survived for three and a half centuries since coming into being during the reign of Charles II, as the two sides of the question of whether James II should have been excluded from the throne because of his catholic beliefs.

The Labour party is a comparative newcomer at 115 years old.

Given the resilience all three have shown, the idea that one or more of them might not exist in ten years time seems strange.

But that is what Labour MP Jon Cruddas has suggested - a remark which was of course reported in the media as his suggesting that Labour might disintegrate within that time frame.

(Honestly, was he surprised?)

Asked whether the Labour Party might "not exist" within ten years, Mr Cruddas, replied: “Yes, yes.”

“There is no safe ground for any orthodox parties and the stakes could be high potentially. They could just disintegrate in real time. And I include in that the party that I represent."

Do I think that the scenario he describes is likely? No.

Is it possible? Of course.

The state of politics is so febrile at the moment that nothing can be ruled out.

There is a Telegraph article on Cruddas's comments at

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/11473827/Miliband-aide-Labour-could-be-extinct-in-a-decade.html

which also includes an account of one of Labour's latest attempts to make this a reality by proposing badly-thought-through and disastrous schemes.

Any party which doesn't want to risk falling apart in the next few years would be well advised to ask itself, "are we in touch with the views and concerns of voters ?"

And the honest answer is that all the parties including new ones like UKIP could do an awful lot better, 

Comments

Jim said…
Just my opinion but I think over the next few years or maybe decades there will be a great shift in UK politics. Not just parties but the system in general. Less and less people are turning out to vote, and I think minority governments and or coalitions will become more the norm. The more players there are the more difficult it is for 1 party to obtain an absolute majority.
Also things are different these days with access to information only a mouse click away, people are no longer dependent on the daily newspapers or what a television station decides is the news this week. People can find information which makes it ever more difficult to "bend the truth" un-noticed.

A recent example would be the chancellor announcing that the deficit has been halved, by changing the measure to gdp rather than the amount. It was quickly noticed. Another would be labours idea that spending is down to 30's levels. which of course is not the case as is easily found out by anyone who cares to look into it.

As I say i think there will be a major change, and the calls for direct democracy will become ever louder. Unless people feel their vote will make a difference they are tending not to bother voting. A classic example was of course the turnout in the Scottish Referendum, it was high because people felt their own vote would make a difference, it was also noted that the options were always moving so the SNP's loss was actually exactly what they were campaining for in the first place (devolution max).

Once there is a move to direct democracy i dont think it will be the end of the political party as such, but the days of political party rule are numbered.
8:42 am
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nick Herbert on his visit to flood hit areas of Cumbria

Please note that the post below was published more than ten year ago on 21st November 2009 Nick Herbert MP, shadow cabinet member for the Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs, was in Cumbria this morning to see the areas affected by the flooding. He writes on Conservative Home about his visit. Here is an extract. I’ve been in Cumbria today to see the areas affected by the floods. I arrived early in Keswick where I met officials from the Environment Agency. Although the river levels had fallen considerably and homes were no longer flooded, the damage to homes had been done. And the water which had got into houses wasn’t just from the river – it was foul water which had risen from the drains. I talked to fire crews who were pumping flood water back into the river, and discovered that they were from Tyne & Wear and Lancashire. They had been called in at an hours’ notice and had been working on the scene ever since, staying at a local hotel. You cannot fail to be impressed by the
Read more

Quotes of the day 19th August 2020

Image
"Wise men profit more from fools than fools from wise men; for the wise men shun the mistakes of fools, but fools do not imitate the successes of the wise."  ( Cato the Elder , who lived 234 BC - 149 BC, quoted in "Lives" by Plutarch.) There is a similar saying by Germany's Iron Chancellor, Otto von Bismarck: Benjamin Franklin is supposed to have put the same saying in a more humorous form: "Wise men profit by the mistakes of others, while fools will not learn even from their own blunders." See also this thread on the "Quote Investigator" website . Let us all be wise and learn from the events of the last few days.
Read more

Quote of the day 24th July 2020

I was moved to put the passage below forward as a quote today when I saw a horrible post on twitter from someone writing that it was "excellent" that someone who took a different view from her about Brexit had died. I won't write which way round it was so that all the Remain supporters can assume the post was from a Brexit fanatic welcoming the death of a remainer and all the Leavers can assume it was a Remainiac welcoming one less Brexiteer. There's been plenty of nasty stuff on both sides but if you catch anyone of your own viewpoint  posting something like that who might listen to you, please do call them out on it - and point out that they're giving everyone on your side of the argument a bad name. Anyway, here's the quote from John Donne.
Read more