Why a free society needs the rule of law and independent courts.

A free society needs more than the ballot box to function.

Anyone who imagines that a society which practices either direct democracy or representative democracy cannot be a tyranny needs only to look at the present governments of Russia or Turkey, at how Hitler or Mussolini came to power in the 20th century, or to read Thucydides' History of the Peloponnesian War.

Only the rule of law and independent courts can stop a democracy from sometimes acting as the tyranny of the 51%.

John McDonnell. who wanted to lock up his political opponents and, when asked under what law, said he might have to invent one, will not now be Chancellor of this country. But he is one of too many people who think like Roper in Robert Bolt's play, "A man for all seasons."

And while there are men (and women) like that in British politics, on all sides, we need laws and strong independent courts to enforce them, as explained by Sir Thomas More in the play, here brilliantly depicted by Paul Scofield.

Comments

Paul Holdsworth said…
Reassuring post, Chris. And I do understand why you choose to be oblique with your criticism of Priti Patel. But eventually, true Conservatives like you will have to be much more outspoken about the multiple wrong turnings your party has taken, and is set to take in future, if we are to avoid permanent damage to those independent institutions on which our democracy stands.
9:27 am
Paul Holdsworth said…
Indeed, your criticism was so oblique I guessed at the wrong target. You meant to coyly point the finger at Suella Braverman, didn't you?
My apologies.
10:02 am
Paul Holdsworth said…
Then again, maybe you meant Patel AND Braverman.
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/priti-patel-delays-publication-windrush-eu-citizens-report-anti-terror-laws-1766590
12:49 pm
Chris Whiteside said…
I had no particular target in mind. There are too many people in journalism and on all sides of politics who are all too prone to accuse judges who make a ruling that they do not like of being "enemies of the people."
10:20 pm
Paul Holdsworth said…
"I had no particular target in mind" - yeah, right!
7:50 am
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nick Herbert on his visit to flood hit areas of Cumbria

Please note that the post below was published more than ten year ago on 21st November 2009 Nick Herbert MP, shadow cabinet member for the Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs, was in Cumbria this morning to see the areas affected by the flooding. He writes on Conservative Home about his visit. Here is an extract. I’ve been in Cumbria today to see the areas affected by the floods. I arrived early in Keswick where I met officials from the Environment Agency. Although the river levels had fallen considerably and homes were no longer flooded, the damage to homes had been done. And the water which had got into houses wasn’t just from the river – it was foul water which had risen from the drains. I talked to fire crews who were pumping flood water back into the river, and discovered that they were from Tyne & Wear and Lancashire. They had been called in at an hours’ notice and had been working on the scene ever since, staying at a local hotel. You cannot fail to be impressed by the...
Read more

Quotes of the day 19th August 2020

Image
"Wise men profit more from fools than fools from wise men; for the wise men shun the mistakes of fools, but fools do not imitate the successes of the wise."  ( Cato the Elder , who lived 234 BC - 149 BC, quoted in "Lives" by Plutarch.) There is a similar saying by Germany's Iron Chancellor, Otto von Bismarck: Benjamin Franklin is supposed to have put the same saying in a more humorous form: "Wise men profit by the mistakes of others, while fools will not learn even from their own blunders." See also this thread on the "Quote Investigator" website . Let us all be wise and learn from the events of the last few days.
Read more

Quote of the day 24th July 2020

I was moved to put the passage below forward as a quote today when I saw a horrible post on twitter from someone writing that it was "excellent" that someone who took a different view from her about Brexit had died. I won't write which way round it was so that all the Remain supporters can assume the post was from a Brexit fanatic welcoming the death of a remainer and all the Leavers can assume it was a Remainiac welcoming one less Brexiteer. There's been plenty of nasty stuff on both sides but if you catch anyone of your own viewpoint  posting something like that who might listen to you, please do call them out on it - and point out that they're giving everyone on your side of the argument a bad name. Anyway, here's the quote from John Donne.
Read more