December meeting of Copeland Borough Council

I must be a glutton for punishment: having spent a large chunk of today attending an online meeting of one council body of which I am myself a member - the Cumbria Health Scrutiny committee -  I then watched and listened to an online meeting of an authority of which I was in the past a member but currently am not, Copeland Borough Council.

The agenda for this afternoon's Copeland Council meeting, the documents for the meeting, and a link to watch and listen to the meeting can be found on the CBC website here.

I had submitted a question under the public participation system.

I asked Councillor McVeigh (the Leader of the Labour group) the following question:

 

“In October the Rt. Hon. Sir Keir Starmer QC, MP, said of the Equalities and Human Rights report into Anti-Semitism in the Labour party,

 

“If – after all the pain, all the grief, and all the evidence in this report – there are still those who think there’s no problem with antisemitism in the Labour party, that it’s all exaggerated, or a factional attack, then, frankly, you are part of the problem too, and you should be nowhere near the Labour party either.”

 

In the light of recent events in Copeland, is Councillor McVeigh in a position to confirm that this statement by the Leader of the Labour party, and the action taken by the present party leadership to address Anti-Semitism, enjoys the full and unequivocal support of the Labour Group on Copeland Borough Council?”

Councillor McVeigh's reply was 

"Of course I support the leader of the Labour party and agree with his comments."

For the avoidance of doubt I welcome this response.

However, I would like to see it more evidently reflected in the way the Labour group on the council behave.

There were some interesting questions and replies put forward on the reports which the council was considering. Where the council was discussing issues on a non-partisan basis - which for some of the time it was - they worked well.

However, there was a pretty distressing display of sectarianism from the Labour majority on the council in the form of two motions from the leader of the Labour group. 

The first of these motions, on agenda item 9, overturned the principle which the council has operated for nearly twenty years, that the post of Chairman of the Council (this is the non-political job which used to be called Mayor before we had a directly-elected Mayor who is the political leader of the council) should be shared between the political groups. Instead Labour pushed through, voted, on what was clearly a party whip vote, the abolition of the rules in the council constitution to share the position of chairman.

The second motion was to replace the Conservative chairman of the Licencing committee with a Labour chairman half-way through the council year. There was no slightest pretence that this was done for anything other than party-political reasons and not a single criticism of the way the councillor who had been chairman of the committee until today was put forward. The only reason given for the motion came from a Labour councillor who said, paraphrasing only slightly,  that she was elected by Labour voters and was there to support Labour candidates. 

In my humble opinion local government works more effectively when those elected to represent different political parties make an effort to work together with political balance and the brutal honesty with which the Labour group were quite open that they were sacking a perfectly competent political opponent and putting in one of their own for party-political reasons was about the only thing which can be said in defence of their actions. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nick Herbert on his visit to flood hit areas of Cumbria

Please note that the post below was published more than ten year ago on 21st November 2009 Nick Herbert MP, shadow cabinet member for the Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs, was in Cumbria this morning to see the areas affected by the flooding. He writes on Conservative Home about his visit. Here is an extract. I’ve been in Cumbria today to see the areas affected by the floods. I arrived early in Keswick where I met officials from the Environment Agency. Although the river levels had fallen considerably and homes were no longer flooded, the damage to homes had been done. And the water which had got into houses wasn’t just from the river – it was foul water which had risen from the drains. I talked to fire crews who were pumping flood water back into the river, and discovered that they were from Tyne & Wear and Lancashire. They had been called in at an hours’ notice and had been working on the scene ever since, staying at a local hotel. You cannot fail to be impressed by the
Read more

Quotes of the day 19th August 2020

Image
"Wise men profit more from fools than fools from wise men; for the wise men shun the mistakes of fools, but fools do not imitate the successes of the wise."  ( Cato the Elder , who lived 234 BC - 149 BC, quoted in "Lives" by Plutarch.) There is a similar saying by Germany's Iron Chancellor, Otto von Bismarck: Benjamin Franklin is supposed to have put the same saying in a more humorous form: "Wise men profit by the mistakes of others, while fools will not learn even from their own blunders." See also this thread on the "Quote Investigator" website . Let us all be wise and learn from the events of the last few days.
Read more

Quote of the day 24th July 2020

I was moved to put the passage below forward as a quote today when I saw a horrible post on twitter from someone writing that it was "excellent" that someone who took a different view from her about Brexit had died. I won't write which way round it was so that all the Remain supporters can assume the post was from a Brexit fanatic welcoming the death of a remainer and all the Leavers can assume it was a Remainiac welcoming one less Brexiteer. There's been plenty of nasty stuff on both sides but if you catch anyone of your own viewpoint  posting something like that who might listen to you, please do call them out on it - and point out that they're giving everyone on your side of the argument a bad name. Anyway, here's the quote from John Donne.
Read more