Quote of the day 18th November 2014

"You can't just point at things and tax them"

(Myleen Klass gives some advice to Ed Miliband during the debate below)


Comments

Jim said…
That will be a pretty hard concept for any politician to grasp. They have, after all, been doing it since the year dot.

1. A problem is discovered
2. Government solves it the only way it knows how, a new tax
3. New tax raises government intake in short term
4. New tax intake begins to fall (ie problem is being reduced)
5. Government sees income falling (a problem)
6. Government solbes it the only way it knows how, a new tax

To quote Del Amitri, But noting ever happens, nothing happens at all, the needle returns to the start of the song and we all sing along like before

the new government never repeal the tax, they just give excuses as to why they wont.
Jim said…
on a completely unrelated issue.....

Im quite looking forward to the Rochester and Strood By-election. For the first time in a long time I may well have been wrong about something, and that will make a nice change. I did predict a few weeks ago (not long after Carswell's win, that Mark Reckless would lose his seat. The polls are sugesting i may well have been way off base here.

I will predict, however, that whichever way it turns out this time at the GE it will return to a blue seat (if i get this wrong too then i am going to go for a hat trick, with this particular constituency) cant wait :o)
Chris Whiteside said…
We shall see - I think it might be closer than the polls suggest but this has often been a difficult seat to call.
Jim said…
The reason I am sticking to the GE results is that historically there has been no better way to give the government of the day a good kicking, than to go against in a by-election (if you can be bothered to turn out that is) many people dont.

Though in a GE any major change (party wise, not necessarily candidate)tends to reverse at a GE (when there is more at stake.

Now, this is an odd one as the candidate defected, rightly or wrongly is a different topic for another day.

The thing is though the by-election is a seat for less than 12 months (so its a great way to get a dig in, without too much backlash) the GE will be more thought out, thats a 5 year seat, so I would predict that the seat will be blue following the 2015 GE.

I thought Reckless would lose his, as he is not quite the politician Doug Carswell is, though, if his candidates like him, combined with the "kick the current government for a while" tactic, then it may be a UKIP seat up until 2015, as is suggested by the polls.

That is why i now think my initial prediction is wrong and the polls are not too far away, for this by-election. And that is why i think the torys will win it back pretty quickly. (well that and the fact i think UKIP will come under the hammer a lot more in the coming months on their policies, or rather lack of them)
Jim said…
If you think about it, it would be perfect timing to elect a Monster Raving Loony. Seriously, what harm would it do?* What I am getting at is this is the last few months of the current government, and of course the last 4 or 5 months are all about the up coming election, the real stuff has been done, following the last election. Now its all promises and "we wills" in time for the next election. So a Monster raving loony now, would not really matter too much.


*well it would harm the candidate as its long been a policy of the Monster Raving Loony Party that if a member is elected, then they were not loony enough to stand, so are kicked out of the party until such as time as they no longer have a seat, so they would resign forcing a by election.
Chris Whiteside said…
The Monster Raving Looney candidates might have some trouble coming up with dafter policies than those currently advocated by the Labour party ...

Popular posts from this blog

Nick Herbert on his visit to flood hit areas of Cumbria

Quotes of the day 19th August 2020

Quote of the day 24th July 2020