Why Labour is like the Broadway Hotel in Blackpool
Earlier this week it came out that the Broadway Hotel in Blackpool fined a Whitehaven couple £100 for posting a bad review on Trip Advisor. (The hotel later agreed to refund the money after a huge public outcry.)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-30111525
Also this week Labour supporters tried to have Myleen Klass fired as the "Face of Littlewoods" for criticising Ed Miliband's tax policy.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/politics/6106475/Labour-supporters-demand-Littlewoods-drop-Myleene.html
The hotel policy was criticised as outrageous and almost certainly illegal, but was it any better for Labour party members to try to take revenge on Myleen Klass for expressing an opinion they didn't agree with (and showing up Ed Miliband)?
But it's not just hotels and a few socialists who have a problem with free speech.
When I was a student I was a strong opponent of the so called "No Platform" policy which some on the left applied to anyone they labelled racist or fascist.
In 1984 (how appropriate) one student union even banned their Jewish society in the name of "Anti-Racism" (because they also had a policy that "Zionism equals Racism" which was and is a view often held on the left.)
Most student politicos on both left and right were given a wake-up call by this event that banning free speech is dangerous: the SU concerned was suspended until they dropped the policy and NUS organised a student demo against one of their own colleges (which certainly made a change from all the "Grants, Cuts, Loans, Moans and Groans" campaigns. And the policy of "No Platform seemed to become less popular for a while.
Brendan O'Neill has an article in the current Spectator about the "Stepford Students" for whom "Free speech is so last century" which suggests that a significant number of present-day University students are very anti freedom of speech, and which I found quite frightening in what it says about the future of our country. You can read that article at:
http://www.spectator.co.uk/features/9376232/free-speech-is-so-last-century-todays-students-want-the-right-to-be-comfortable/
I once believed that a belief in freedom of speech was a vital part of this country's DNA. Apparently that belief is not as strong as I had once thought and hoped.
The approach usually attributed to Voltaire - "I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" - has never been more needed.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-30111525
Also this week Labour supporters tried to have Myleen Klass fired as the "Face of Littlewoods" for criticising Ed Miliband's tax policy.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/politics/6106475/Labour-supporters-demand-Littlewoods-drop-Myleene.html
The hotel policy was criticised as outrageous and almost certainly illegal, but was it any better for Labour party members to try to take revenge on Myleen Klass for expressing an opinion they didn't agree with (and showing up Ed Miliband)?
But it's not just hotels and a few socialists who have a problem with free speech.
When I was a student I was a strong opponent of the so called "No Platform" policy which some on the left applied to anyone they labelled racist or fascist.
In 1984 (how appropriate) one student union even banned their Jewish society in the name of "Anti-Racism" (because they also had a policy that "Zionism equals Racism" which was and is a view often held on the left.)
Most student politicos on both left and right were given a wake-up call by this event that banning free speech is dangerous: the SU concerned was suspended until they dropped the policy and NUS organised a student demo against one of their own colleges (which certainly made a change from all the "Grants, Cuts, Loans, Moans and Groans" campaigns. And the policy of "No Platform seemed to become less popular for a while.
Brendan O'Neill has an article in the current Spectator about the "Stepford Students" for whom "Free speech is so last century" which suggests that a significant number of present-day University students are very anti freedom of speech, and which I found quite frightening in what it says about the future of our country. You can read that article at:
http://www.spectator.co.uk/features/9376232/free-speech-is-so-last-century-todays-students-want-the-right-to-be-comfortable/
I once believed that a belief in freedom of speech was a vital part of this country's DNA. Apparently that belief is not as strong as I had once thought and hoped.
The approach usually attributed to Voltaire - "I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" - has never been more needed.
Comments
Also when the green party were wanting to ban from the house of commons of all places anyone who opposed climate change, I mean, What?
I will say this about this blog though, I am very often critical of the conservative party and its policy's, but never once has a comment been dis allowed. Often argued, which is great and is pretty much always as intended, but never just deleted or blocked.
Its never truer if something is a really bad idea then let it be presented then shoot it down as the bad idea it is, banning the person from putting the idea forward gives the (often false) impression the idea is so good that it can not be countered
That is exactly "it"
I mean could you honestly imagine amazon lasting more than a week if they brought out a policy stating you can buy it but if you give it a bad review then we double the price.
the days of trust are over, the days of substance are here
I have my issues with Amazon but the fact that they let people post almost anything about their without hindrance is certainly one of their strengths - it means people know that if a product was rubbish everyone would say so.
I have allowed Labour councillors and occasionally even activists from a certain party which I detest far more than Labour or UKIP make comments on this blog if they are not offensive or liable to land me in legal trouble. I do block comments very occasionally, but hardly ever from someone who has signed their name and never just because I disagree with them. By comparison, when Jamie Reed started a blog he would not even accept a comment from me welcoming his blog.
those are blog rules not censorship, its quite clear that offensive language and inappropriate commenting on an obituary post are not welcome.
But any dabate on any issue posted is always welcomed and allowed to stand, and that is a very positive thing.