When turkeys don't vote for Christmas ...
Here is a quiz with three questions.
1) Which party handed four council seats to their opponents on a plate at the last Copeland Borough Council elections in 2015 because they could not find enough candidates to stand for the council and hence failed to put up a full ticket in several wards where they previously held all the seats?
2) Which party put a three-line whip yesterday against proposals from the council's all-party executive (including their own then leader, who has resigned over the issue,) backed by independent research, to reduce the size of the same council?
3) If it is the same party, would that be what the more intellectual students of politics might call "cognitive dissonance" and those who prefer more pithy language might describe as "bonkers?"
Surprise, surprise, the answers are
1) Labour
2) Labour, and
3) Yes.
Copeland Borough Council voted yesterday on whether to recommend to the Boundary Commission that the number of councillors should be reduced from 51 to 33 as part of their boundary review. The motion was put forward by Independent Mayor Mike Starkey on behalf of the cross-party executive.
Originally this had not been handled in a party political manner but that changed when the issue came to full council and the Labour group put a three-line party whip against the proposal.
All the Conservative councillors and almost all the Independents voted for the motion but the Labour party voted solidly against and the proposal fell by 26 votes to 18.
I gather that some on the Labour side took offence at one of my colleagues describing their position using the old saying about turkeys voting for Christmas.
Too bad. There are times when people take offence because someone has said something wrong, and other times when people take offence because the truth hurts. And this is one of the latter occasions.
1) Which party handed four council seats to their opponents on a plate at the last Copeland Borough Council elections in 2015 because they could not find enough candidates to stand for the council and hence failed to put up a full ticket in several wards where they previously held all the seats?
2) Which party put a three-line whip yesterday against proposals from the council's all-party executive (including their own then leader, who has resigned over the issue,) backed by independent research, to reduce the size of the same council?
3) If it is the same party, would that be what the more intellectual students of politics might call "cognitive dissonance" and those who prefer more pithy language might describe as "bonkers?"
Surprise, surprise, the answers are
1) Labour
2) Labour, and
3) Yes.
Copeland Borough Council voted yesterday on whether to recommend to the Boundary Commission that the number of councillors should be reduced from 51 to 33 as part of their boundary review. The motion was put forward by Independent Mayor Mike Starkey on behalf of the cross-party executive.
Originally this had not been handled in a party political manner but that changed when the issue came to full council and the Labour group put a three-line party whip against the proposal.
All the Conservative councillors and almost all the Independents voted for the motion but the Labour party voted solidly against and the proposal fell by 26 votes to 18.
I gather that some on the Labour side took offence at one of my colleagues describing their position using the old saying about turkeys voting for Christmas.
Too bad. There are times when people take offence because someone has said something wrong, and other times when people take offence because the truth hurts. And this is one of the latter occasions.
Comments