Two opposing fantasies about the Euro
There are two opposite and equally ludicrous British fantasies about the Euro. The one which most of the political class believed fifteen years ago was that joining the Euro would be good for Britain and it was inevitable that we would join within at most a decade.
Only a handful even of the dwindling band of Federalists still think that now - Ken Clarke does not expect to see Britain replace the pound by the Euro in his lifetime.
Much more persistent among the far from diminishing band of hardline Eurosceptics is the view, in my opinion equally silly, that the Euro has been a disaster for all participants and will collapse soon.
People who have convinced themselves of this are living on another planet.
The Euro has been a disaster for countries like Greece, Spain and Italy which were insane to join it and should never have been allowed to. For Germany, and for countries which have economies closely aligned to Germany and are willing to accept the loss of independent economic policy which it entails, the Euro has been reasonably successful.
"But what about the recession" I hear some voices cry.
The world recession was caused mainly by poor worldwide regulation of banks. It was admittedly exacerbated in the Eurozone by overly severe monetary policies, but I believe that most of the relevant countries would probably still have followed similar policies if they had retained their own currencies. The problem was the policy, not the Euro per se.
"One size fits all," or rather doesn't, is a massive problem if countries try to share a currency with Germany when their economies or economic policies are not in sync with the German economy. That is why Britain would have been mad to scrap the pound for the Euro, and why Spain, Italy and Greece were foolish to join.
However, for the majority of the Euro's history, countries which ARE in sync with Germany have found the single currency a net advantage.
If the Euro was likely to collapse, it would almost certainly have done so five years ago. A monetary system which has survived the past sixteen years can survive almost anything.
The fact that I think the Euro is here for the long term does not mean Britain should have joined it or that Greece should stay in it. When someone as pro-Euro as Ken Clarke, but who unlike many people of that view has a mind capable of being influenced by evidence, thinks and says publicly that it is time to start planning for "Grexit" then the case for preparing a positive future for Greece outside the Euro and the Eurozone without Greece is strong.
Comments
but Here it is.
I recall giving a presentation more than twenty years ago to a joint conference of the YCs and the youth wing of the Christian Democrats explaining why I didn't think it would be in the interests of Britain or Germany if Britain joined the Euro, and that was BEFORE opposition to Euro membership became the party line.
(I was the nearest thing to a Eurosceptic speaker at the conference, but the German delegates actually said they thought it was the most interesting talk of the meeting, probably because I presented a sceptical view in a manner which was not at all hostile to the other countries of Europe.)
As the local constituency chairman I actually did some of the on-the-ground organisation of stewards etc for the very first stop of William Hague's "Keep the Pound" lorry in St Albans.
I also thought it was daft for Greece and Italy to join at the time they did.
So this is not a view I have just converted to after Ken Clarke said the same thing.