Time to remove the protected status of Seagulls

Eight years ago on this blog I raised concerns about seagulls which were picked up by the Whitehaven News.

The problem of aggressive seagulls in Whitehaven has continued to get worse and was picked up this week by the Daily Mail.

I think it is time to remove the protected status of seagulls - they are not remotely endangered, we could not wipe them out if we tried - and they are becoming a health hazard because

1) we have foolishly allowed them to associate humans with food and

2) they have lost their fear of humans.

I think when it came out that primary school children at Jericho School had had to be escorted past the gulls into school after coming under attack from them was probably the tipping point for a lot of people.

We need to get the situation under control.

Comments

Jim said…
I think its another of those, one law for one place and one law for another, would work well.

Sure I agree 100% in West Cumbria seagulls are a menace and they absolutely do not need protection status. Though in other areas they are wanting the seagull to return, of course not in the same level we have them, but you know what i mean.


Its why a london centric blanket system never seems to work well. I do think a controlled culling method is the best system for West Cumbria, egg pricking that type of thing. Though sadly seagulls are no good to eat, they taste horrible due the crap they eat themselves (I know, I tried one once in Capetown) it was like taking a duck, rolling it around in dog muck then serving it, it was awful.

so we cant eat them, we need to slow the breeding down, also re-introducing a fear of humans would not really be a bad thing on the whole.
8:31 pm
Chris Whiteside said…
I think you're talking a lot of good sense there, Jim. It should be a local decision, and in many parts of the country where control is needed, pricking the eggs would be a better strategy than a cull.

Plus severe penalties for the idiots who feed them, an action which is very much against the interests of both seagulls and humans.
11:27 pm
Jim said…
Well yes, deliberately feeding seagulls is just plain asking for it and a pretty stupid thing to do. Though there are other measures which help, wheelie bins are a good example. As are public litter bins with the flaps on the openings of them.

Right now people need to be thinking of seagulls as "rats with wings", lets face it, no one goes out to feed the rats. For as long as they associate people with food we will have a problem. Getting their birds back on to their natural diet (herrings) would be a major victory - yes they are called herring gulls as that is what they would naturally eat, they are not known as "haddock, battered with a few chips on the side and mushy peas gulls.

3:22 pm
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nick Herbert on his visit to flood hit areas of Cumbria

Please note that the post below was published more than ten year ago on 21st November 2009 Nick Herbert MP, shadow cabinet member for the Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs, was in Cumbria this morning to see the areas affected by the flooding. He writes on Conservative Home about his visit. Here is an extract. I’ve been in Cumbria today to see the areas affected by the floods. I arrived early in Keswick where I met officials from the Environment Agency. Although the river levels had fallen considerably and homes were no longer flooded, the damage to homes had been done. And the water which had got into houses wasn’t just from the river – it was foul water which had risen from the drains. I talked to fire crews who were pumping flood water back into the river, and discovered that they were from Tyne & Wear and Lancashire. They had been called in at an hours’ notice and had been working on the scene ever since, staying at a local hotel. You cannot fail to be impressed by the...
Read more

Quotes of the day 19th August 2020

Image
"Wise men profit more from fools than fools from wise men; for the wise men shun the mistakes of fools, but fools do not imitate the successes of the wise."  ( Cato the Elder , who lived 234 BC - 149 BC, quoted in "Lives" by Plutarch.) There is a similar saying by Germany's Iron Chancellor, Otto von Bismarck: Benjamin Franklin is supposed to have put the same saying in a more humorous form: "Wise men profit by the mistakes of others, while fools will not learn even from their own blunders." See also this thread on the "Quote Investigator" website . Let us all be wise and learn from the events of the last few days.
Read more

Quote of the day 24th July 2020

I was moved to put the passage below forward as a quote today when I saw a horrible post on twitter from someone writing that it was "excellent" that someone who took a different view from her about Brexit had died. I won't write which way round it was so that all the Remain supporters can assume the post was from a Brexit fanatic welcoming the death of a remainer and all the Leavers can assume it was a Remainiac welcoming one less Brexiteer. There's been plenty of nasty stuff on both sides but if you catch anyone of your own viewpoint  posting something like that who might listen to you, please do call them out on it - and point out that they're giving everyone on your side of the argument a bad name. Anyway, here's the quote from John Donne.
Read more