Rescue in the Mediterreanean
It was right to reverse the previous policy on rescue in the Mediterranean. It is wrong to rewrite history in order to use a tragedy to score political points.
This Telegraph article by Dan Hodges contains points which should be uncomfortable reading for people in all political parties, including Conservatives, Lib/Dems, Labour and UKIP supporters. There are no easy answers to the tragic situations in Libya, Syria or Iraq. But we need to somehow find the right balance between rushing in gung-ho with all guns blazing and trying to totally ignore the massacre of innocent people in Africa and the Middle East.
And make no mistake - if we try to ignore the problems of the Middle East, they will not indefinitely ignore us.
This Telegraph article by Dan Hodges contains points which should be uncomfortable reading for people in all political parties, including Conservatives, Lib/Dems, Labour and UKIP supporters. There are no easy answers to the tragic situations in Libya, Syria or Iraq. But we need to somehow find the right balance between rushing in gung-ho with all guns blazing and trying to totally ignore the massacre of innocent people in Africa and the Middle East.
And make no mistake - if we try to ignore the problems of the Middle East, they will not indefinitely ignore us.
Comments
Until the cause is removed there can only ever be at best "moving" of the symptom.
Its just you have to break the law in the first instance, as thats the only way to take advantage of it. We build up defenses to stop people taking the easy route to it, so we are in fact encouraging an illegal smuggling trade. People think the reward outweighs tye risk, so they take the risk.
It will continue to happen until we change the attraction. I also agree with you that its not going to be an easy thing to do, and there are no simple answers. There very rarely is a magic wand solution, but we have to have joined up policy, and action to deal with it. That is why simple "UKIP" style solutions wont work, only a joined up policy and a great deal of effort will work.
fences and baricades and things, preventing people illegally getting to the pot will never work for as long as the pot is there. Every fence has a "weakest point" and every weakest point repaired only creates a new weakest point, which also has the side effect of greater risk to the people trying to get in.
Changing a policy to one by which you can have safe crossing and entry legally IF YOU MEET THE CRITERIA, must be a better way than "you can have everything you want, if you can get here"
Complex problems indeed, and as I say, complex problems tend not to have easy answers.
All people need to work together on this.
Honestly the kindle and smart phone are in many ways worse than the press for editing and bending what I said.
I would have said "worse than a Labour party conference, but that's just going too far"