On the Assassination attempt on Salman Rushdie

I was horrified to learn that Sir Salman Rushdie was stabbed this evening while on a public stage.


The suspect who has been arrested in connection with the incident is apparently 24 yours old - which means he wasn't born when that vicious, murderous old monster Ayatollah Khomeini issued what he was pleased to call a Fatwa but should be described as a criminal incitement to assassination against Salman Rushdie for writing the novel "The Satanic Verses" which some Muslims think is blasphemous.


There are many people who have a high opinion of Salman Rushdie's work, and they are entitled to their opinions, which I respect, but you do not have to be a fan of his work to believe that he should have the right to publish it.


I condemn the Fatwa and anyone who seeks to implement it not because I hold any particular view about the merits of Rushdie's work, but for a different reason - my attitude can be summed up in the words which Evelyn Beatrice Hall used to describe the views of Voltaire, and which are often wrongly assumed to be a quote from him,

“I wholly disapprove of what you say—and will defend to the death your right to say it.”


If anything about this horrible incident depresses me almost as much as the attack on the author, it was a comment on the BBC this evening by an author who has studied the effects of the Fatwa that the novel "The Satanic Verses" not only could not be published today but could not even be written.


That is an indictment of our failure to stand up for free speech.


I believe that all views about religion, including atheism, should be treated with respect, with one extremely important exception - those who think that their views about religion entitle them to kill other human beings, other than in self-defence, deserve no respect whatsoever. (That exception, by the way, applies to atheist regimes which persecute religious believers just as it does to theocratic regimes which persecute different faiths and atheists.) 


Therefore I do not support anyone who deliberately sets out to denigrate or insult anyone's religious faith. (I'm not convinced, by the way, that Salman Rushdie did have that intention.) 


But as soon as you allow the allegation that a given statement, film or book insults someone's faith to be grounds to censor it - or worse, to murder the author or distributor of that statement, film or book - you have given every vile extremist nutcase the power to shut down debate and suppress other viewpoints. That would be intolerable.


I hope that Salman Rushdie makes a full recovery.

Comments

Anonymous said…
He's a Very Naughty Boy
11:42 pm
Chris Whiteside said…
I'm not sure whether the above comment was a joke or a reference to the fact that there were attempts to ban Monty Python's "Life of Brian" in which that line - to quote it in full, "He's not the Messiah, he's a very naughty boy" - first appeared.

I didn't agree with trying to ban that film either.

However, to be fair to the people who tried to stop "Life of Brian" appearing, they didn't support assassinating the actors or writers, nor did they firebomb cinemas which showed the film.

People do have every right to turn up outside a cinema where a film they don't approve of is being shown, to protest in an orderly and non-violent manner, carrying placards or handing out leaflets explaining why they don't like the film.

The point where they cross a line no democracy should accept is when they resort to violence or intimidation.
1:21 am
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nick Herbert on his visit to flood hit areas of Cumbria

Please note that the post below was published more than ten year ago on 21st November 2009 Nick Herbert MP, shadow cabinet member for the Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs, was in Cumbria this morning to see the areas affected by the flooding. He writes on Conservative Home about his visit. Here is an extract. I’ve been in Cumbria today to see the areas affected by the floods. I arrived early in Keswick where I met officials from the Environment Agency. Although the river levels had fallen considerably and homes were no longer flooded, the damage to homes had been done. And the water which had got into houses wasn’t just from the river – it was foul water which had risen from the drains. I talked to fire crews who were pumping flood water back into the river, and discovered that they were from Tyne & Wear and Lancashire. They had been called in at an hours’ notice and had been working on the scene ever since, staying at a local hotel. You cannot fail to be impressed by the
Read more

Quotes of the day 19th August 2020

Image
"Wise men profit more from fools than fools from wise men; for the wise men shun the mistakes of fools, but fools do not imitate the successes of the wise."  ( Cato the Elder , who lived 234 BC - 149 BC, quoted in "Lives" by Plutarch.) There is a similar saying by Germany's Iron Chancellor, Otto von Bismarck: Benjamin Franklin is supposed to have put the same saying in a more humorous form: "Wise men profit by the mistakes of others, while fools will not learn even from their own blunders." See also this thread on the "Quote Investigator" website . Let us all be wise and learn from the events of the last few days.
Read more

Quote of the day 24th July 2020

Image
I was moved to put the passage below forward as a quote today when I saw a horrible post on twitter from someone writing that it was "excellent" that someone who took a different view from her about Brexit had died. I won't write which way round it was so that all the Remain supporters can assume the post was from a Brexit fanatic welcoming the death of a remainer and all the Leavers can assume it was a Remainiac welcoming one less Brexiteer. There's been plenty of nasty stuff on both sides but if you catch anyone of your own viewpoint  posting something like that who might listen to you, please do call them out on it - and point out that they're giving everyone on your side of the argument a bad name. Anyway, here's the quote from John Donne.
Read more